So, depending on the exact rifle model in question, it’s likely that one chambered in 325 WSM will be somewhat shorter and handier as well as potentially a little lighter. However, the 270 WSM uses a heavier rifle and the .270 Winchester gets a slight edge when both are used in the same weight rifle. Additionally, while neither cartridge has a belt, the .270 Winchester uses a traditional rimless design while the 270 WSM has a rebated rim. That extra velocity makes a bit of a difference in terms of wind drift and overall trajectory to be sure, but that slightly flatter trajectory is less important in this day and age of laser rangefinders, particularly if you have a scope equipped with a bullet drop compensating dial. However, the 300 WSM could have an advantage on those sort of hunts because it’s available a smaller and easier to carry rifle. Hit a little high, couple inches below the backstrap, just behind the shoulderblade. The two cartridges have a virtually identical trajectory out to 400 yards, but the less aerodynamic .338 bullet starts to drop off in performance at longer range compared to the 325 WSM. Taken together, these factors all maximize the case capacity of the WSM cartridges, even though their overall length of 2.86″ is still short enough to fit in a short-action rifle. Of these, 140 grain, 150 grain, 160 grain, and 175 grain loads are by far the most common. You can even use them both on larger game like kudu, eland, red stag, elk, and moose with great results. The .300 Winchester Magnum and 300 Winchester Short Magnum cartridges have essentially the same external ballistics. However, there are many, many other factors that influence accuracy more than that one trait. 270 vs 308 WIN: WHICH ONE SHOULD YOU HUNT WITH? The author has found his Winchester Model 70 Classic Featherweight Jack O’Connor Commemorative in .270 Win. What about accuracy of the 300 Win Mag vs 300 WSM? It also carries a tad more energy out to longer range and is capable of excellent accuracy. Both will work exceptionally well on game ranging from whitetail, mule, and fallow deer all the way up to elk and moose out to several hundred yards. However, the 270 WSM has a very fat case with minimal taper and a much steeper shoulder angle (35 degrees vs 17.5 degrees). For this reason, while they will do the job on deer sized game, the 325 WSM and .338 Win Mag are both excellent choices for larger game like caribou, elk, moose, red stag, kudu, and eland. The .270 Winchester delivers great a performance and but I think an excellent scope must complement it for good measure. Just like with the 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag and 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag, even though the 325 WSM uses a case with a larger diameter, the .338 Win Mag itself has a relatively large diameter case and is significantly longer. Contents.270 Winchester.30-06 Springfield; Recoil and Shootability. 270 Winchester 140 grain Information | Ballistics . New 6.5 Creedmoor Bullet designs Edging Out .270 Winchester Performance? Remember: we’re talking about accuracy under practical hunting conditions, not benchrest shooting where a .1″ or .2″ improvement in group size can make a big difference. Mag. This is not the case for the 7mm WSM though. Is the 7mm WSM capable of excellent accuracy? Not huge, but advantage Creedmoor nonetheless.Quite interesting is that the Creedmoor achieves this performance with roughly 15 grains less powder than the 270 Winchester. The resulting .270 Winchester cartridge (also known as the .270 Win for short) was formally released in 1925 for the Winchester Model 54 rifle. The .300 Winchester Magnum and 300 WSM (along with the .30-30 Winchester, .308 Winchester, .30-06 Springfield, .300 Remington Ultra Magnum, .300 Remington Short Action Ultra Magnum, 300 PRC, and .300 Weatherby) use the same .30 caliber bullets. I went with the 325 to try something different for a change. The 270 WSM does indeed have a flatter trajectory and more resistance to wind drift than the .270 Winchester. Is it significantly more accurate than the 7mm Remington Magnum? With that in mind, you’re probably not giving up any potential magazine space by choosing a rifle chambered in 300 WSM with a 3 round magazine. Pros: Better performance at medium ranges. That’s why, in general, orders placed before 3:00pm Eastern on a weekday will ship same day. Hornady Superformance, .270 Winchester, SST, 130 Grain, 500 Rounds quantity. The .300 Win Mag is a bit more widely adopted, but you probably won’t have any issues finding a nice rifle chambered in 300 WSM either. Estimated temp of 60 degrees 150 gr SST bullet 54.8 RL-26 1) 2906 2) 2909 3) 2886 Another data point: 300 Win mag Sako A7 24"barrel Win brass Federal 215 primers 165 grain Nosler BT Approximately 65 degrees RL-26 1) 3186 2) 3182 3) 3184 Groups with this load have averaged .7". The 325 WSM is an attractive choice for hunters in the niches I described above and those that use the cartridge generally seem to absolutely love it. I personally would not touch any new .270 Win rifle with a barrel of less than 24". Copyright © 2021 Big Game Hunting Adventures LLC | All Rights Reserved. John. Our cartridge database is large enough that we have several instances of the same grain, and same manufactuer for both cartridges. The 270 win has had a slight edge over the 280 with 140gr. The WSM cases all have a .535″ rebated rim that’s compatible with a standard magnum size bolt face. The Savage 11/11 Trophy Hunter XP 270 Win is probably one of your best choices if you’re looking for a hunting rifle that is tough, powerful, and has one of the best scopes out there. These two cartridges present an interesting case though. It really depends on which rounds your are comparing. Many of the most popular centerfire rifle cartridges in the United States, like the .270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield (both of which have an overall length 3.34″), require the use of what is commonly referred to as a “standard action” or “long-action” rifle. The .270 cartridges were developed by Winchester in 1923, but it wasn’t released onto the market until 1925. While there is a big overlap in bullet weights the 325 WSM and .338 Win Mag can use (both cartridges are commonly loaded with bullets in the 180 grain to 250 grain range), the .338 Win Mag generally leans a little heavier than the 325 WSM. This is not a hard and fast rule though and it’s sometimes possible to find rifles chambered in 7mm Remington Magnum that can accommodate another round or two compared to those chambered in 7mm WSM. .270 Win, works well on gophers. Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by Lee Q. Loader, Jul 18, 2019. Both rifles in this case also have a 3 round magazine as well, so there’s no advantage there with either cartridge. Even so, I’d personally lean towards .338 Win Mag since it generally functions more reliably, shoots larger diameter bullets, and is usually a tiny bit more powerful. Top . wusses when it comes to recoil. An additional benefit of uniform powder burn is the requirement for less powder to achieve desired velocities. That being said, it’s probably a little bit more expensive and, while there’s a good variety of ammo for the cartridge, the .270 Winchester usually has a bigger selection regardless of where you go. Both cartridges are also well suited for hand loaders and reloading components for the .270 Winchester and 270 WSM are widely available. They should be nearly identical. History: The .270 was introduced in 1925, but really gained prominence in the 1940s and 1950s when writers such as Jack O’Conner and Townsend Whelen sang its praises. Hornady 270 Winchester 130 gr GMX Superformance Ammo 20 rd: AUD0.00: 80543: Hornady 270 Winchester 130 gr SST Superformance Ammo 20 rd: AUD0.00: 80563: Hornady 270 Winchester 140 gr SST Superformance Ammo 20 rd: AUD0.00: 80573: Hornady 7mm-08 Remington 139 gr SST Superformance Ammo 20 rd: AUD0.00: 80576 : Hornady 7mm-08 Remington 139 gr GMX Superformance … The exact size of the rifle action (which includes the locking bolt, firing pin, etc.) Due to the long running popularity of the .270 Winchester, there’s a plethora of quality bullets to choose from for both cartridges. Who ever heard of that? It’s just that it doesn’t offer a significant improvement in power over the 325 WSM at close range, but still has more recoil. The first is a "LEAD-FREE" California-compliant bronze tip round. This is not a guarantee of course and there are 325 WSM rifles feed quite reliably. They’re both great cartridges and I’d personally say that the 325 WSM is the second most appealing choice out of the Winchester Short Magnum line (behind the 300WSM). Winchester beat Remington to the punch and speed when it created its now famous 270 in 1925, but Remington beat Winchester to the belted magnum party with its 7mm Remington Magnum in 1962. As you can see, the two cartridges have almost identical amounts of recoil with the 270 WSM in this particular example actually having a tiny bit less free recoil energy than the .270 Winchester. Each and every component is made to meet or exceed the most demanding quality control and performance standards in the industry. Before we get started, I have an administrative note: Some of the links below are affiliate links. If you prefer a shorter, potentially lighter rifle, that’s slightly faster cycling and easier to carry, but still has magnum performance, then go with the 300 WSM. The .270 can be made to work very well in a 22-inch barrel, which I consider to be an advantage. The .270 Weatherby Magnum took advantage of its big case to launch a 130 grain bullet about 200 fps faster than possible from the .270 Winchester. The sharp, pointed polymer tip creates a faster, flatter shooting bullet. On the other hand, that’s not a gigantic advantage in favor of the 270 WSM either. Most manufacturers produces rifles chambered in .338 Win Mag, so it’s not too difficult to find a good rifle in that cartridge. However, the two cartridges have some similarities as well. I just changed the .388 to .338 like it should be. On the other hand, the Winchester Short Magnum cartridge does not have a gigantic advantage in either category either and there’s actually a smaller difference in the ballistics of the 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag than there is with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester. The situation with rifles in is pretty similar. Since those older cartridges already have such well established (and deserved) reputations, not to mention an abundant selection of quality rifles and ammunition, any new cartridge competing against them had better provide a significant advantage to convince enough people to make that switch. I called him and said, 'Now that’s a way to run a business.' It is our mission to deliver your ammunition quickly at a great price – all while helping to support those who protect our freedoms to do so. Additionally, the company also advertised that the shorter case used by the WSM cartridges resulted in superior accuracy and less recoil. Case capacities and reloading data were obtained from Chuck Hawks and Nosler (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here). The answers to the above questions really depend on the rifle, ammunition, and shooter in question though. The same goes for guns: rifles chambered in .270 Winchester are among the most commonly produced centerfire rifles in the United States. The great thing about the WSM family is that converting one to another is easy if the others die off(270,300,325). Though Winchester advertises a 24″ long barrel and a 7.25 pound overall weight for each cartridge in this particular Model 70, the rifle chambered in 7mm WSM is 1/2″ shorter overall. Learn More. However, the 8mm bullets (.323″) used by the 325 WSM (as well as the 8mm Mauser, 8mm Rem Mag, and 8×68 S) are not nearly as easy to find in the United States. Hunters also like that the cartridge works well in barrels of 23- and 24-inch lengths. Looking at it that way, it’s not surprising that the 7mm WSM is likely on its way out. The answers to the above questions really depend on the rifle, ammunition, and shooter in question though. A fair-haired boy as cartridges go, the .270 Winchester has charmed hunters since its 1925 birth. The generally better feeding and overall reliability of most 7mm Remington Magnum rifles is a big plus as well. With every purchase, Ammo.com donates to an organization that shares our values. The boattail design enhances accuracy and an alloyed lead core provides increased weight retention for deeper penetration. The .338 Winchester Magnum (along with the .338 Federal, .338 Lapua, .340 Weatherby Magnum, .338 Ruger Compact Magnum, and .338 Remington Ultra Mag) all use the same .338″ bullets. Orders placed after this time, or on a weekend or holiday, will ship the next business day. Factory loads for the 7mm WSM and 7mm Rem Mag often use the exact same bullets fired at virtually the same muzzle velocity. For instance, the 325 WSM has 99% of the energy of the .338 WSM at the muzzle, 94% at 200 yards, and 86% of the energy of the .338 Win Mag at 500 yards. John C. said: "You all were recommended to me by a buddy. In that same vein, those fat, stubby 270 WSM cartridges with their very steep shoulder angle can sometimes present feeding problems. Though it’s not quite as commonly used as cartridges like the .270 Winchester, 7mm Remington Magnum, or .300 Winchester Magnum, the .338 Winchester Magnum is still quite popular. When brought to market in 1925, the 270 Win. I've harvested numerous deer and elk. After all, fans of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out the benefits of the shorter and fatter powder column. So with that said, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with the 300 WSM either I understand why other hunters prefer the 300 WSM. Is the 270 WSM capable of excellent accuracy? I love their performance and the fact that I'm no longer wasting a lot of meat. In theory, this results in improved accuracy for the shorter case. Finally, it’s also nice to have that extra round or two of ammunition in your magazine available if you end up needing it one day. Winchester Ballistic Silvertip ammunition provides hunters immediate knockdown and extreme precision. You got to figure one or two should survive. So, while the rifle chambered in 7mm WSM is not really any lighter, it’s a tiny bit shorter and handier. Absolutely. At the same time, the 300 WSM has most closely lived up to the hype, which explains why it’s far and away the most popular of the bunch. Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk. Description: An old reliable. At 300 yards, far beyond normal game-killing ranges of the day, that missile still clocked 2,320 – faster than a .30-30’s at the muzzle! The 7mm WSM does indeed have a flatter trajectory and a tiny bit more resistance to wind drift than the 7mm Rem Mag. The .270 Win when I (as a novice) compare the charts side by side with the "hot" "favorites" out there, like the 6.5 Creed, it out performs them in usually every category. A big selection of rifles. That heavier and more aerodynamic bullet retains energy better at long range and the edge in kinetic energy grows as the distance increases. However, though the 8×68 S is relatively popular in Europe, 8mm cartridges simply aren’t very popular in North America and neither cartridge is widely used on this side of the Atlantic. For those reasons, the two cartridges have very similar case capacity, but the 7mm Rem Mag can hold a tiny bit more powder than the 7mm WSM. However, 200 grain, 225 grain, and 250 grain bullet weights are most common for .338 Win Mag factory ammo. This 270 win ammo is loaded with a 140 grain super performance bullet by Hornady. The .308 Winchester has the edge with these particular 150 grain loads, but there are also instances where certain 150 grain .270 Winchester loads have the edge in terms of trajectory, retained energy, and wind drift. The Winchester Short Magnum line of cartridges is a good example of how even well designed products that largely accomplish the goals set by the manufacturer can fail to catch on with the hunting community. Several specialty bullets come loaded from the factory including Nosler Partition, Accubond, and Barnes TSX – just to mention a few of the choices. The 270 Winchester is clearly one of the shooting sport’s premier big game cartridges. mag and the 6.5 Creedmoor and a few others. the 7mm wsm and the 325wsm. What about accuracy of the 325 WSM vs 338 Win Mag? Basically, their stated goal was to give shooters and hunters all the benefits of a short action cartridge (like the .308 Winchester pictured below) with essentially the same external ballistics as comparable standard length cartridges (like the .270 Winchester cartridge in the photo below).So, how’d they do it? The Lyman 50th Edition (p197-198, 199-200, 214-216, 219-220,257-259, 260-262, 288-289, 294-295) and Hornady 10th Edition (p351-359, 356-359, 406-411, 412-416, 564-573, 574-585, 637-639, 659-664) reloading manuals were used as references for the history of the cartridges. Both rifles in this case also have a 3 round magazine as well, so there’s no advantage there with either cartridge. After all we wouldn’t want to hurt someone’s sensitive feelings. This is a benefit that should not be overlooked either. However, similar to the case of the 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag, the 325 WSM is capable of attaining almost the same performance as the .338 Win Mag while using less powder. Re: Federal Fusion 270 Winchester 130 grain performance on deer? First chambered in the company’s Model 54 bolt rifle, it drove a 130-grain bullet 3,140 fps. The increase in performance according to some sources by making a 270 improved is 7.8%, the 280's improvement in performance is rated at 7.7%. However, they’re being measured against four of the most popular American centerfire rifle cartridges of all time in the .270 Winchester, 7mm Remington Magnum, .300 Winchester Magnum, and .338 Winchester Magnum, and that’s a tough hurdle to get over. The generally better feeding and overall reliability of most .270 Win rifles is a big plus as well. 30-30 vs 45-70 Which Lever Action Is Best For You? However, don’t underestimate the importance of the greater variety, wider availability, and lower overall cost of .270 Winchester rifles and ammunition. There’s not a darn thing wrong with the 270 WSM either though and there’s really no reason to make a switch either if you already have a good hunting rifle chambered in either cartridge that you like. At the same time, the 300 WSM is the most popular Winchester Short Magnum cartridge and is also extremely commonly used as well. The two cartridges (along with others like the 7mm Mauser, 7mm-08, 7mm Weatherby, 280 Remington, 280 Ackley Improved, and 7mm Remington Ultra Magnum) use the same .284″ bullets. Especially when hunting at shorter ranges (inside 200 yards), the 325 Winchester Short Magnum offers virtually the same performance as the .338 Win Mag, but with considerably less recoil. Additionally, the 7mm Remington Magnum is a traditional belted magnum while the 7mm WSM has a rebated rim and no belt. However, while that may well contribute somewhat to improved accuracy, there are many other factors that influence accuracy to a much larger degree. For this reason, this particular Model 70 in 270 WSM is actually longer (44″ vs 42.5″) and heavier (7.25 pounds vs 7 pounds) than the Model 70 in .270 Winchester. Once again, the .300 Win Mag Hornady load has the edge over the 300 WSM in this area. Conclusion . It probably doesn’t crack the Top 10 list, but it’s close. Like I mentioned a minute ago, that particular 325 WSM load above has essentially the same trajectory and still has about 95% of the kinetic energy of that .338 Win Mag load. At the range and in the field, this cartridge works well with a variety of bullet / powder combinations. By the way, good luck finding any modern rifle in .270 Win with 26" barrels. Winchester sells the cartridge with bullets weighing between 130 and 150 grains that have proven effective for harvesting animals like deer and elk. The modern “magnum era” began in earnest with the introduction of the 7mm Remington Magnum and .300 Winchester Magnum cartridges during the 1960s. The data used to compare the trajectory and wind drift of the cartridges was obtained from Hornady (here, here, here and here), Federal (here, here, here, here, here, and here), Nosler (here), and Winchester (here). This makes sense since the 7mm WSM is specifically designed to fit in a short action rifle instead of a standard length action like the 7mm Rem Mag. Everything was perfect. Both are wonderful for situations like hunting mule deer in Arizona or pronghorn in Wyoming. In 2002, Winchester developed their .270 Winchester Short Magnum (WSM) to improve the performance of the iconic .270 Winchester. After all, the .300 Win Mag is capable of excellent accuracy itself and is generally very highly regarded in that area as well. Not surprisingly, this results in some interesting ballistic comparisons. This is an incredibly small practical difference. But, even though the .338 Winchester Magnum does have a belted case (which the 325 WSM lacks), the .338 Win Mag generally has a reputation for pretty reliable feeding in most rifles. mag, 300Win. This cartridge, with less powder burning more efficiently, generates less recoil than similar cartridges. Maybe, but probably not. LMAO. Even though the 7mm WSM uses a larger diameter case, the 7mm Rem Mag uses a relatively large diameter case itself and is significantly longer. Add to wishlist. As you can see, that particular 325 WSM load has about 83% of the free recoil energy of the .338 Win Mag load, which is a pretty major reduction in recoil. There is a decent selection of factory ammo available in the cartridge from companies like Federal, Hornady, and Winchester. Best 243 Ammo For Hunting Deer, Hogs, & Varmints, Best 270 Ammo For Hunting Deer, Elk, & Other Game, 6.5 Grendel vs 5.56/223: Review & Comparison, Best 308 Ammo For Hunting Deer, Elk, Hogs, & Other Game, Best 7mm-08 Ammo For Hunting Elk, Deer & Other Game, 6.5 Creedmoor vs 300 Win Mag Review & Comparison, Best 7mm Rem Mag Ammo For Hunting Elk, Deer & Other Game, 6.5 Creedmoor vs 243 Winchester Review & Comparison, 6.5 Creedmoor vs 7mm-08 Remington Review & Comparison, 6.5 Grendel vs 308: Everything You Need To Know, Essential Muzzleloader Supplies Every Hunter Needs In 2021. The first three cartridges were all designed and marketed specifically as short action alternatives to extremely popular and effective standard length cartridges: the .270 Winchester for the .270 Winchester Short Magnum, the 7mm Remington Magnum for the 7mm Winchester Short Magnum, and the .300 Winchester Magnum for the 300 Winchester Short Magnum. Three-shot groups commonly spread less than one inch at 100 yards. The 270 Winchester Short Magnum very likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter powder column. This specific model weighs 7.25 pounds when chambered in 270 WSM and 7 pounds when chambered in .270 Winchester. Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:49 pm Posts: 33600 Location: Northern British Columbia Ridge_Runner wrote: for about 5 tears it was my "deer gun" never felt undergunned. You get clear images, accurate shooting, and knockdown power that no other rifle can match. I purchased a Browning AB3 in the 300wsm set it up with a Nikon scope and put a slip proof sling on it… THEN, I purchased the the “twin” in a 270wsm and did the same thing I did with the 300wsm.. The war on Terrorism sparked a massive corporate bidding frenzy for military contracts. In the early 1990's I switched to 150 gr Nosler Partitions for my .270 Mauser Mark X and .270 Winchester. This is one of the tougher aspects of using the 325 WSM: there’s not a gigantic variety of factory ammo or a large number of bullet choices for hand loaders to choose from. Both cartridges are also well suited for hand loaders and reloading components for the .300 Win Mag and 300 WSM are widely available. Maximum pressure obtained from SAAMI (p23, 24, 28, 30, 31, and 32). I made phone contact with a live person on a Saturday afternoon. Now, the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges were not the first commercially produced short magnums. First, the .270 Winchester is significantly longer. At reasonable shooting ranges, there’s very little practical difference between them ballistically and both cartridges will really do a number on both species of game. The two Hornady loads fired the same bullet with a scant 30 fps of difference between them, with the .300 Win Mag having a tiny velocity edge. This is the first instance where we’ve seen the Winchester Short Magnum serve up similar performance with an appreciable reduction in recoil. It’s a wonderful cartridge and there are plenty of quality ammo and rifle choices for you. In addition to potentially giving up a little bit of magazine capacity due to the fat and stubby design of the 325 WSM cartridge, those same traits (along with the cartridge’s very steep shoulder angle) can sometimes present feeding problems. #1810 bullet. Indeed, it’s even possible to see that much shot to shot variation within the same box of ammo for a particular cartridge. In fact, they rave about it. I think we can agree that most hunters and shooters in North America are probably familiar with the venerable .270 Winchester, 7mm Remington Magnum, .300 Winchester Magnum cartridges. Performance. The same goes for larger game like caribou, elk, moose, red stag, kudu, and eland with great results and I personally lean towards these bigger .30 caliber cartridges as opposed to the .270 and 7mm cartridges previously discussed for an Africa, Canada, or New Zealand hunting safari. Just like with the 270 WSM, this is due to the very large diameter of the 7mm WSM cases that simply take up more space in a rifle magazine than the thinner 7mm Rem Mag case. Drop, wind, energy, and velocity - usually wins across the board. This is not a hard and fast rule, but it is a common occurrence with these two particular cartridges. These cartridges perform near identical. When the .270 Winchester appeared in 1925 as one of the rounds in the company’s new Model 54 bolt-action rifle, the chambering apparently did not sell spectacularly. Included in every order is a donation to a pro-freedom organization that shares our values. I am a fan of the WSM cartridges. If you already have a rifle in the cartridge and don’t mind the smaller selection of factory ammo (or if you’re into handloading), the 7mm WSM will also serve you very well as a hunting cartridge.Unfortunately, the future isn’t looking very bright for that cartridge right now. At the same time, the lighter recoil and flatter trajectory of the 325 WSM give it a bit of a leg up on .338 Win Mag for hunting deer sized game where the extra power of the .338 Win Mag isn’t as useful. Posted on August 16, 2017 by Ed Hale. On the other hand, the majority of 7mm WSM factory loads use bullets in the 140-162 grain range and 140, 150, and 162gr bullets are pretty common. I shot 3 rounds over the chrono, and 3 rounds at a target that … Specifically, the new 270 WSM, 7mm WSM, 300 WSM, and 325 WSM cartridges were all designed to use a very compact case that would fit in a short action rifle. What about when comparing bullets of the same or very similar weight? Both Nosler’s 142g Long Range AccuBond™ and Hornady’s Precision Hunter™ 143g ELD-X™ in 6.5 Creedmoor have come up with bullet Long Range designs that edge out the .270 Winchester bullets even though the .270 … While it’s certainly nice to have if possible, a the difference in a theoretical 1.25″ vs a 1.5″ group most likely won’t matter much while actually hunting at reasonable ranges. However, the rifles are noticeably lightweight, offering non belted magnum performance; that all shoot accurately. First, let’s talk about the history of the Winchester Short Magnum (WSM) line of cartridges and what the company was trying to achieve. On the other hand, if a light weight rifle is less important and if you don’t have any issues with a standard length rifle action or just prefer an older and more established cartridge with a larger variety of ammo and rifle choices, then go with the .300 Win Mag.If you already have a quality rifle that you like chambered in either cartridge though, I don’t see any compelling reason to make a switch to the other one unless you just want to. Just like with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester, 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag, and 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag, the .338 Win Mag is significantly longer than the 325 WSM. Virtually every major brand of ammo is available in 7mm Rem Mag. For those reasons, the 270 WSM is unique among the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges for actually having significantly more case capacity (around 10-20% more, depending on the case manufacturer) than its standard length cousin.
Batman 1 1940 Read Online, Csa T20 Challenge 2021 Live Telecast, Atlanta Dental Spa Buckhead, Where Does Charlie Wilson Live, Prix Taxi Paris Cdg,